: Help ensure your autofocus is properly aligned with a Canon Precision Alignment : New firmware version 1.1.1 is available for EOS R6 Mark II : New firmware version 1.8.1 is available for EOS R6 : New firmware version 1.0.3.1 is available for EOS-R5 C : New firmware version 1.4.1 is available for EOS R3 I haven't seen how Lightroom behaves, but I think I read that it had the same ability to manage disconnected images (images stored on drives that are not currently connected to the computer.) apply tags to everything shot at the same event) - or even apply adjustments en-masse (apply, say, a white balance adjustment to every image shot in the same lighting setup.) Bridge opens Photoshop to do any changes and in Photoshop you can copy an adjustment from one image to another, but it's a bit more cumbersome to do it. This allows you to search for images that aren't even on your computer - and when you find the one you want, it'll tell you it's on a disconnected drive and it'll tell you the name of the drive so you can go get it and connect it to the computer. It maintains a library entry, thumbnail, and if you want it can even maintain a lower-quality JPEG "preview" image. it knows where they are even when the disk is gone. But Aperture can manage the the offline images. So you could have projects or events that live on external disks and aren't actually connected to your computer at all times. "referenced" leaves the files wherever you want them (more like Bridge).īUT. "managed" images live inside the Aperture library (and you can have more than one library if you want). It lets you search by rank & keywords but it's not as robust as what you find in a digital asset management system.Īs an example, in Aperture, when I bring in images I can choose to have them "managed" or "referenced". I pretty much treat this like a Coke / Pepsi thing and don't feel that one of them is truly "better" than the other and it's more a matter of personal taste.īridge works a bit more like a file browser - but with some photography specific tagging and filtering capabilities. I use a lot of tools on my Mac and I find that Aperture (not-surprisingly) has better integration with everything else on the Mac.Īs such. It doesn't work with Photoshop any better than Aperture does. I tried Lightroom in it's pre 1.0 beta days but even after release and watching several revisions, it was too much like Aperture (I suppose that's a good thing) so I saw little value in swtiching. Adobe is still in the "one computer" world. they seem to consider everything to be a "family pack" in that once you buy something from the App Store you are allowed to install it on every computer YOU legitimately own. Recently I've noticed Apple seems to be drastically lowering the cost of software - if not giving it away for free. Lightroom is available on both Windows and Mac. I have long felt that Adobe is exceptionally proud of they software and thing it should be priced as if they were selling gold bars. The two are roughly equal in terms of what they can do. feeling threatened by this new product (and rightly so) responded by creating Lightroom - more or less a shameless rip-off of Aperture. So they created Aperture - which deal with all of this.Īdobe. they realized that the Photoshop editing process is not protective of the original image and is also QUITE bulky (files really have a filespace "bloat" problem becasue of the nature of the "layer" system.) They also recognized that 98% of the time, you're "adjusting" images and not doing wholesale edits (you're not creating composite images, etc.) Lastly. They also recognized that if you shoot enough, you fill up your hard drive and need a way to deal with offline storage so that you can archive the shots you aren't working with NOW and yet not lose track of the fact that you have them. They recognized that a typical photographer probably shoots a large number of images which are all related - they belong to the same event or project, etc. in Apple's way of doing things, they recognized that Photoshop - though quite powerful - wasn't very practical for everyday use nor did it have any management capabilities. Aperture is only available for the Mac - since it's Apple software.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |